Acta Medica International

PICTORIAL ESSAY
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 45--51

The study of different presentations of breast lumps in radiographic imaging


Shalini Saraswat1, Amit Kumar2,  
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad - 24400, U.P, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of ENT, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad - 24400, U.P, India

Correspondence Address:
Shalini Saraswat
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre, Moradabad, U.P
India

Abstract

Introduction: Breast USG is an established and accurate tool for the primary evaluation of breast lumps and pathology. It also compliments X-ray mammography in further evaluation and characterization of breast masses and thus avoids surgeries in benign breast diseases and pathology. Method: For USG examination of the breast lumps, a linear-array transducer of 5-7 MHz frequency is required with a good resolution machine. Results: We present a pictorial essay on the role of USG in evaluation and characterization of various breast lumps and pathology. Conclusion: Breast sonography considerably improves the visualization and evaluation of lumps in mammographically radiodense breasts and helpful in the characterization of it, either as solid or cystic lesion. It also improves the specificity of X-ray mammography when used as an adjunct to it. It is also helpful in guiding FNAC/biopsy from the breast masses.



How to cite this article:
Saraswat S, Kumar A. The study of different presentations of breast lumps in radiographic imaging.Acta Med Int 2014;1:45-51


How to cite this URL:
Saraswat S, Kumar A. The study of different presentations of breast lumps in radiographic imaging. Acta Med Int [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Sep 29 ];1:45-51
Available from: https://www.actamedicainternational.com/text.asp?2014/1/1/45/209398


Full Text



 Introduction



Because of increased incidence of breast cancer in females, a breast lump may worry both the patient and clinician. Breast ultrasonography is appropriate investigation for the initial evaluation of a female younger than 30 years with a palpable breast lump and also helpful in the evaluation of X-ray mammographic abnormalities i.e. masses, focal asymmetric densities, areas of architectural distortion and palpable abnormalities not seen mammographically.[1] Additional imaging with MRI and FNAC/biopsy might be needed in the cases, for the confirmation of the sonographic diagnosis.

USG guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) is a frequently performed and accurate alternative to stereotactic/excisional biopsy.[2],[3] USG may be guided aspiration of symptomatic cysts, complicated cysts, and possible abscesses are also readily performed.[4]

USG feature analysis of breast masses continues to improve,[5] though interobserver variability continues to be a problem, in avoiding biopsy.[6],[7] An illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonographic lexicon[8] helpful in improving observer performance.

 Method



For USG examination of the breast lumps, a linear-array transducer of 5-7 MHz frequency is required with a good resolution machine. The patient is scanned in the supine position for the inner part of thebreast and then in the contralateral posterior oblique position with the ipsilateral raised arm, for the axilla and upper outer quadrants.

 Result & Discussion



Normal anatomy [Figure 1]{Figure 1}

On sonography, normal breast parenchyma has alternate hyperechoic and hypo echoic layers:

Skin – hyperechoic

Subcutaneous fat – hypoechoic

Fibroglandular breast parenchyma – hyper echoic

Retromammary fat – hypo echoic

Muscle (Pectoralis major)– hyperechoic

Cooper’s ligaments are echogenic bands that suspend the breast from the superficial layer of the fascia.

Ductal ectasia [Figure 2]{Figure 2}

Duct ectasia most commonly affects the ducts in Retroareolar region but may also involve the smaller peripheral ducts. USG shows tubular anechoic dilated structures or ducts filled with echoes [Figure 2], and there may be associated nipple discharge. Duct ectasia usually present as a painful breast and/or palpable lump, or the condition may be asymptomatic and apparent only at imaging as an incidental finding.

Breast cysts [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b{Figure 3}

Simple cysts in the breast are anechoic lesions on USG, with a thin echogenic capsule, posterior acoustic enhancement, and thin clear edge shadow. Complex cysts are heterogeneous, have internal echoes, septations, thick irregular walls or internal solid components. Complex cysts, especially those with internal solid components, may turn out to be malignant on histopathology.[9]

Intraductal and intracystic papillomas/papillary carcinoma [Figure 4]a, [Figure 4]b{Figure 4}

Breast Papillomas may be intracystic [Figure 4]a or intraductal [Figure 4]b. They could not be differentiated from papillary carcinomas only by sonographic features. FNAC/biopsy of the lesions is required to rule out malignancy. Intraductal papillomas/carcinomas usually present with a complaint of bloody nipple discharge.

Fibroadenoma [Figure 5]{Figure 5}

Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast tumor in young females. It may increase in size during adolescence, pregnancy and lactation. It may also present with atrophic changes after menopause. On USG, it is usually homogenous, well-defined, hypoechoic, oval, wider than tall, with/without posterior acoustic enhancement. The calcifications within a fibroadenoma are usually of the coarse variety and may show posterior acoustic shadowing on USG. Fibroadenomas with complex features on USG have a higher incidence of transformation into breast cancer.[10]

Juvenile breast fibroadenoma [Figure 6]{Figure 6}

Juvenile fibroadenoma is the most frequent benign tumor of the breast in adolescents and young females, tends to be between 11 and 18 years, which coincides with the puberty onset.[11],[12]

Giant breast fibroadenoma [Figure 7]{Figure 7}

Giant fibroadenoma is defined to be more than 5 cm in diameter, and/or weighing more than 500gm.[12] Giant fibroadenomas are rare breast lesions, representing less than 4% of all fibroadenomas. They present as a rapidly growing, well circumscribed, unilateral breast mass lesion. Its close differential is Cystosarcoma Phyllodes Tumors on USG.

Intramammary/axillary lymph nodes [Figure 8]a, [Figure 8]b{Figure 8}

Lymph nodes are most commonly located in the upper outer quadrant, primarily in the Axillary tail region. Hilar notch and fatty hilum should be visible to make the diagnosis. Normal intramammary lymph nodes are usually less than 1 cm in short axis diameter along with loss of fatty hilum and increased vascularity on color Doppler.

Galactoceles [Figure 9]{Figure 9}

It usually occurs during lactation or shortly after stoppage of breast-feeding, caused by an obstruction in milk duct. At X-ray mammography, galactoceles may present as an indeterminate mass, unless fat-fluid level is seen within. Even if the fat-fluid level is not present, a benign pathology can be considered, by the identification of fat within the lesion. US may show a complex mass. The diagnosis should make on the basis of the clinical history and aspiration.

Cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors [Figure 10]{Figure 10}

They are fibroepithelial stromal tumors of the breast. These can be either benign or malignant. They are rapidly growing tumors, with high recurrence rate and may even metastasize in rare cases. On USG, these are usually benign-looking lesions with internal clefts, cystic spaces and are moderately vascular on Doppler.[13]

Breast abscess [Figure 11]a, [Figure 11]b, [Figure 11]c{Figure 11}

Breast abscess is usually present clinically with high-grade fever, painful breast lump, skin erythema and edema. Acute abscesses may occur during lactation, due to blockage in the duct with secondary milk collection and infection.

Breast edema [Figure 12]{Figure 12}

Edema of the breast can occur in inflammatory/infective conditions, following surgery or radiation. It may also occur due to venous or lymphatic obstruction as present in neoplastic etiology.

Lipomas [Figure 13]{Figure 13}

These are fatty tumors in the breast parenchyma and vary in appearance on USG, ranging from uniformly echogenic to heterogeneous or completely anechoic lesions e.g.: Oil cysts.

Hamartomas or fibroadenolipomas [Figure 14]{Figure 14}

These are fat-containing, benign tumors in the breast parenchyma along with varying amount of fibrous tissue. They are heterogeneous in nature with mixed internal hypoechoic and echogenic areas.

Fat necrosis in breast [Figure 15]{Figure 15}

Fat necrosis is a common entity. However, may pose a difficulty to clinicians and sonologist, because of its different manifestations and USG appearances. Fat necrosis may result from accidental trauma, after surgery or radiation therapy.[14] When symptomatic, fat necrosis typically presents as a small, painless, ill-defined breast mass. The sonographic features are varied and depend on the degree of fibrosis in lesion. It may present as a solid echogenic mass, a complex mass with mural nodules or internal echogenic bands, an anechoic mass with posterior enhancement or shadowing, as an isoechoic mass.[14] The margins range from well circumscribed to indistinct to spiculated. A mass with echogenic internal bands that shift in orientation with changes in patient position has been described as a specific sonographic indicator of fat necrosis. It is thought that these echogenic bands represent the interface between the fat and the serous–hemorrhagic components of fat necrosis.

Invasive ductal carcinoma [Figure 16]{Figure 16}

These are usually irregular, ill-defined, microlobulated heterogeneous lesions with infiltrative, spiculated margins. They may be taller than wide in dimensions. Microcalcifications may be usually seen as echogenic foci within the lesion.

Invasive lobular carcinoma [Figure 17]{Figure 17}

Invasive lobular carcinoma is the second most common breast malignancy and may be seen in elderly females. Lesions have variable appearances on X-ray mammography and sonomammography so can be missed on X-ray mammography. On USG, tumor appearances are ranging from findings similar to ductal carcinomas to areas of architectural distortion. Some of these tumors may even not visualized on USG.[15]

Medullary carcinoma [Figure 18]{Figure 18}

These are uncommon breast malignancy. On sonography, it shows benign feature like homogenous, hypoechoic lesion with well-circumscribed margins with/without posterior acoustic enhancement.

Mucinous carcinoma [Figure 19]{Figure 19}

It is also uncommon breast malignancy. The mucin contents of the tumor may be echogenic on USG.

Recurrent breast cancer [Figure 20]{Figure 20}

Recurrence of tumor may occur even years after treatment of the primary breast malignancy. So follow up is required in all the cases. It may occur in the residual breast tissue or even in the chest wall in cases of complete mastectomy. It may metastasize even after primary surgical resection of the tumor.

Gynecomastia [Figure 21]{Figure 21}

Gynecomastia is more common in the male breast than malignancy. Usually it presents as palpable lump or asymmetry in the breast region. It is seen as a hypoechoic lesion in retroareolar region, similar to fibroglandular breast tissue of the female breast.

Male breast cancer [Figure 22]{Figure 22}

About 1% of all breast cancers occur in the male patient. If there is the presence of any lesion within male breast tissue on USG, histopathology is must as incidence of malignancy is high in male breast lesions. Sonography findings are similar as of female breast cancer.

 Conclusion



Breast sonography considerably improves the visualization and evaluation of lumps in mammographically radiodense breasts and helpful in the characterization of it, either as solid or cystic lesion. It also improves the specificity of X-ray mammography when used as an adjunct to it.

References

1Bassett LW. Imaging of breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:669-691.
2Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
3Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, et al. US-guided core breast biopsy: Use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208: 717-723.
4Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: Results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001;219:785-792.
5Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134.
6Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, et al. Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1621-1625.
7Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999;213: 889-894.
8Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: Ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001; 36:217-225.
9Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: Sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;227:183–91.
10Sklair-Levy M, Sella T, Alweiss T, et al. Incidence and management of complex fibroadenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:214–8.
11Davis S, Wallace A. A 19 year old with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and juvenile fibroadenoma of the breast. Breast J 2001;7:430–3.
12Wechselberger G, Schoeller T, Piza-Katzer H. Juvenile fibroadenoma of the breast Surgery 2002;132:106–7.
13Bassett LW. Imaging of breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:669–91.
14Hogge JP, Robinson RE, Magnant CM, et al. The mammographic spectrum of fat necrosis of the breast. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:1347-1356.
15Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, et al. Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:325-30.