Acta Medica International

REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46--50

Progress of health psychology regulation: A comparison between countries


Teresa Sanchez-Gutierrez1, Sara Barbeito2, Juan Antonio Becerra-García2, Ana Calvo2 
1 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR); Department of Methodology and Behavioral Sciences. National Distance Education University (UNED), Spain
2 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR), Spain

Correspondence Address:
Ana Calvo
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja. UNIR. Avenida de La Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, La Rioja
Spain

The independent practice of clinical psychology has experimented recent changes. Spain has achieved to regulate the current professional situation of the different figures of clinical psychologists mainly in three arms: 1) by authorizing those psychologists who met the required legal criteria to continue with their clinical practice, 2) by creating the Master in General Health Psychology (MGHP) and 3) by maintaining the tasks and public scope for Psychologist Specialized in Clinical Psychology (PSCP) This manuscript aims to summarize the process for the regulation of clinical and health psychology in Spain and to compare it to other European and North American countries. Discussion about the quality, benefits and future ambitions of the MGHP programs have been made.


How to cite this article:
Sanchez-Gutierrez T, Barbeito S, Becerra-García JA, Calvo A. Progress of health psychology regulation: A comparison between countries.Acta Med Int 2017;4:46-50


How to cite this URL:
Sanchez-Gutierrez T, Barbeito S, Becerra-García JA, Calvo A. Progress of health psychology regulation: A comparison between countries. Acta Med Int [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 10 ];4:46-50
Available from: http://www.actamedicainternational.com/article.asp?issn=2349-0578;year=2017;volume=4;issue=1;spage=46;epage=50;aulast=Sanchez-Gutierrez;type=0