• Users Online: 11
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 24-30

Empathy level among the medical students of national defence university of malaysia consuming toronto empathy scale


Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Perdana Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Date of Web Publication30-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mainul Haque
Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ami.ami_73_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Multiple research articles were continuously emphasizing that constructive effects of empathy improve patient care. Medical professional bodies often talk that medical doctors need to be competent in clinical skills and empathetic. There was enormous demand from patients that doctors should be empathetic and motivate listeners. Therefore, medical educators became highly concern about the issue whether their students possess empathetic qualities. The Aim of the Study: To measure the empathy level among the medical students and to perform validation and reliability study of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among medical students of the Defence University of Malaysia to measure empathy level. The TEQ was utilized to collect data. The data were collected in early second half of 2017. The universal sampling method was adopted, and data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Software. Results: The current study population holds an average level of empathy. Female medical students had statistically significantly (P = 0.001) higher scores than their male friends. There no statistically significant differences observed in the TEQ score between the year of study (P = 0.948) and type of admission (P = 0.065). Conclusion: The current study respondents possess an average level of empathy. Educational intervention can be incorporated to enhance empathy level which sequentially promotes patient care.

Keywords: Empathy, Malaysia, medical students, Toronto empathy scale


How to cite this article:
Haque M, Lutfi SN, Othman NS, Lugova H, Abdullah SL. Empathy level among the medical students of national defence university of malaysia consuming toronto empathy scale. Acta Med Int 2018;5:24-30

How to cite this URL:
Haque M, Lutfi SN, Othman NS, Lugova H, Abdullah SL. Empathy level among the medical students of national defence university of malaysia consuming toronto empathy scale. Acta Med Int [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 18];5:24-30. Available from: http://www.actamedicainternational.com/text.asp?2018/5/1/24/228227




  Introduction Top


Humans are supportive and accommodating, much more than chimpanzees and other primates.[1] The collective work attitude developed in the parenting practices was observed among apes' ancestors of the human being who lived a few million years ago. This kind of human collaboration – the joint baby-sitting of these apes – was the decisive moment that commanded to Homo sapiens being emotionally current human beings, skilled of reciprocated gratitude and considerate.[1] Around 100,000 years back, the human brain and neural volume start augmented to trebled in size and utilized for social relation dimensions such as empathy, language, cooperative planning, altruism, parent–child attachment, social cognition, and the construction of the personal self in relationships.[2] Thereafter, Charles Darwin wrote “all sentient beings developed through natural selection in such a way that pleasant sensations serve as their guide, and especially the pleasure derived from sociability and from loving our families.”[3] Empathy is the most imperative talent that leads to better accomplishment both in individual and professional issue and promotes to be happier when practiced.[4] There is a range of “empathy, with pity at one end, empathy at the other and compassion and sympathy somewhere in between. Society needs to undergo an empathic revolution” if human being wants to continue as a species on this planet.[5]

The successful and effectual practice of medicine needs narrative mastery, that is, the “ability to acknowledge, absorb, interpret, and act” on the description of troubles of an individual patient. The medical doctors who accomplish their work with narrative competence, called narrative medicine, are recommended as a model for compassionate, understanding, tolerant, and effective practice of medicine. Espousing approaches such as “close reading of literature and reflective writing allows narrative medicine” to look at and irradiate four of medicine's dominant narrative state of affairs: “physician and patient, physician and self, physician and colleagues, and physicians and society.”[6] “The empathic component of medicine is what makes a physician special; without it medical doctors are highly trained computers.”[7] Today, most medical schools because of myopically focus on medical education and prospectus which is wholesomely technical tactic obfuscate the human side of medicine and wear away empathy – the capability to comprehend and care about a patient compulsion.[8] In the empathy levels of medical students diminishing as they become older.[9],[10] Several of them lose their devotion toward patients. Thereafter, converted to a technician, as through textbooks, laboratory experiments, and lectures; future doctors, acquire body parts, processes, and conditions; the hard science of medicine. Again, medical students, then submissively validate their knowledge through high order of professional examinations.[8]

It has been often observed that at least 50% of medical students were burnout characterized by emotional collapse, skepticism and depersonalization, and reductions in personal success and usefulness.[11],[12] It has been observed medical students were higher level burnout as calculated utilizing the Maslach Burnout Inventory were associated with lower empathy scores as assessed consuming the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Student Version. Furthermore, professionalism climate instrument also revealed similar lower scores in medical students, residents, and faculty within the learning environment with more burnout individuals.[13] Another study revealed that medical students possess higher empathy scores were significantly and positively linked with higher grades of clinical competence and especially with female medical students.[14]

Pragmatic evidence authenticates and establishes significant associations with patients' contentment with their medical doctors, interpersonal confidence, and acquiescence with physicians' commendations.[15] Another Argentine study reported that doctors were concern level was poor about their patients' day to day difficulties and a lower potential to appreciate and comprehend patient misery standing on patients' shoes.[16] One British conducted in a Homoeopathic Hospital observed that patients' comprehension regarding physicians' empathy is pivotal to facilitate the interim and long-term improvement of patients' health and overall well being.[17] Similarly, another British study among general practitioners revealed that GPs' empathy level had strategic significance on the patient to facilitate health outcomes equally high and low hardship context.[18] Another cross-sectional study among German cancer patients revealed that doctors' empathy was significantly associated with averting depression and humanizing quality of life.[19] The same also identified that doctors' stress deleterious effect. Finally, this German study concluded that “empathy, as an outcome-relevant professional competence, needs to be assessed and developed more intensively in medical students and physicians.”[19] Empathy is a multifaceted complex notion and expertise with cognitive, affective, and behavioral components.[20],[21],[22] Clinical empathy is defined as “the ability to identify an individual's unique situation (perspective, opinions, ideas, and feelings), to communicate that understanding back to the individual and to act on that understanding helpfully.”[20] Thereafter, physician training on empathic expression with resulted in significant optimistic enhancements of up to 51% in empathic scores among the trained physicians in the study population.[23] It has been concluded by another British study that doctors who possess and practice high quality of clinical empathy achieve greater rapport with their patients' and acceptance clinical decisions.[24] A large, well-powered recommended that optimistic, patient observation of physician's “empathy had significant effects on reducing the extent and severity of the most common infectious disease on the planet.”[25] This study also observed there was a significant change in the level Interleukin-8 and neutrophils count in those patients who score their doctors 50/50 on empathy, compassion and willingness to listen.[25] Interleukin-8 and neutrophils have been considered as an important marker for viral infection.[26],[27] Therefore, it has been concluded a number research that doctors' who possess with high empathetic quality their patients not only satisfied but also significantly decreases several disease biomarkers.[28],[29],[30] Physician's empathy was reported to enhance patient's enablement,[31] that in sequence give rise to better compliance with treatment and boosted health outcomes.[32] Patient enablement denotes to the capacity of the patient to recognize, comprehend, and deal with their disease,[33],[34] and hereafter, empathy is an essential quality for all medical doctors, especially those who handle chronic illness patients.[35] Research outcomes point out that medical students' empathy scores were significantly associated with students' clinical competence. The empathy level among medical students at the start of their studies in medical school was found statistically significantly related to future specialty preference and career choice.[36],[37],[38],[39] Hereafter, recommend that enlightening empathy during undergraduate studies by posing directed courses is essential for augmenting clinical skills.[14],[40]

The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) was developed to quantity professionally and consistently assess empathy.[41] It has been reported that earlier instrument to measure empathy fail to accomplish great diverseness and multifariousness,[42] but TEQ was formulated on the broadest level.[41] The TEQ is 16-item five-point Likert type self-reported questionnaire assesses behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and physiological aspects of empathy in individuals in broadspectrum. Furthermore, the survey form comprises avowals that incorporate an all-encompassing variety of qualities related with the theoretic features of empathy such as emotion comprehension and sympathetic physiological arousal to assess global empathy as the TEQ theorizes empathy as a first and foremost emotive and passionate drill.[43],[44],[45],[46] The scale assesses the frequency that the statements are considered true and ranges from 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often to 4 = always).[41] The TEQ has been utilized to conduct quite a lot of studies in several countries of North America, Europe, and the Caribbean Islands.[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53],[54] The TEQ instrument has been recognized as a reliable questionnaire to assess empathy for different age groups which include adolescents, university students, adults, and general practitioners with satisfactory psychometric properties.[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50],[51],[54] This was intended to investigate abilities among medical students of National Defence University of Malaysia [Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (UPNM)], the comparison between sexes and year of the study. Furthermore, to the best of the researchers' knowledge, there had been no study had been conducted regarding empathy level among medical students of UPNM utilizing TEQ instrument.


  Materials and Methods Top


Type of study

This was a cross-sectional study.

Place of study

The study was conducted in Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health (FPKP), UPNM (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Study period

Data were collected from July 15, 2017 to September 14, 2017.

Source of population

Medical students of Session 2016–2017 of year I–V.

Sampling method

Universal sampling method was adopted as total population was small.

Data collection tool

The TEQ was utilized to collect the data.[41] The necessary permission was obtained prior utilization the instrument. As universal sampling method was adopted and currently, FPKP has a total of 241 students from year I to V, thereafter, 241 questionnaires disturbed among the medical students of FPKP, UPNM. Medical students of the current study were explained vividly about research and data will be utilized for a research paper. Furthermore, students were informed that participation in the present study is the entirely voluntary basis and anonymous. Informed written consent was obtained along with data collection.

Data management and analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software 21 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) collected were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.

Ethical approval and financial support

This research obtained approval and financial support from Centre for Research and Innovation Management, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Sungai Besi, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Code of Research: UPNM/2017/GPJP/SSK/1, Memo No: UPNM (PPPI) 16.01/02/134 (1), 21 June 2017.


  Results Top


Out of 241 questionnaires distributed, 224 returned giving response rate 92.95%. Among the study respondents, 54% (121) and 46% (103) were male and female, respectively. Year-wise distribution was 21.9% (49), 19.2% (43), 17.9% (40), 13.8%, and 27.2% (61) were year-I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. The study respondent ethnic distribution was 65.2% (146), 23.2% (52), 11.2% (25), and 0.4% (1) were Malay, Indian, Chinese, and others, respectively. The students were admitted 63.4% (142), 21.9% (49), and 14.7% (33) were as Cadet Officers, Civil Student, and Territorial Army, respectively [Table 1].
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of study respondents (n=224)

Click here to view


Details regarding descriptive statistics for the TEQ 16 items are depicted in [Table 2]. The higher median value was 4 and was found in the items 3 and 5. Niceties concerning about the internal consistency reliability for the TEQ 16 items are illustrated in [Table 3]. The Cronbach's alpha and convergent validity of the TEQ instrument was found 0.735 and 0.300–0.573, respectively [Table 4]. There was statistically significant (P = 0.001) differences was between sexes. Male (44.5 ± 6.4) respondents had significantly lower TEQ scores than female (47.4 ± 5.6) counterpart [Table 5]. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant (P = 0.065) differences observed [Table 5] between the TEQ scores of Cadet Officers (46.4 ± 6.2), Territorial Army (46.2 ± 6.1), and Civil students (44.0 ± 6.0). Similarly, there were no statistically significant (P = 0.948) differences observed between the year of study [Table 6].
Table 2: Descriptive statistics for the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire items[41] of the current study

Click here to view
Table 3: Internal consistency reliability for the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire items[41] of the current study

Click here to view
Table 4: Reliability and validity of overall

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison of the total Toronto Empathy Questionnaire score by sex and admission category (n=224)

Click here to view
Table 6: Comparison of Total Empathy Quotient score based on year of study (n=224)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The current study response rate was 92.95%. It can be considered as adequate as it has been reported that “response rates approximating 60% for most research should be the goal of researchers and certainly are the expectation of the Editor and Associate Editors of the Journal.”[55] Another research revealed on an average 56%.[56] The same study summarized nine research articles regarding response, and it was revealed lowest and highest was 32.6% and 75%, respectively, for the paper-based survey.[56] Thereafter, the current study response was high and can be explained as the study population and area was a military medical school, hence, discipline is a foremost issue for any military of this planet.[57] “Women were taking 60% of medical school places in the UK, rising to 70% at some universities. Medical schools should do more to attract male students who are being heavily outnumbered by women with better A-level results and more convincing extramural skills.”[58] More recently reported that “men are less likely than women to go to British universities, those who do are more likely to drop out, and those who complete their course are less likely to get a good degree, according to a Think Tank report.”[59] Similarly, many paper-based research studies among medical students of Malaysia reported that the number of female medical students increased outnumbering male colleagues.[60],[61],[62] In contrast to those earlier reports, the current study respondents' male medical students were higher their female friends. This is very difficult to explain, but maybe a military medical school was less preferred by females. Malaysia is a federal constitutional monarchy and a multiconfessional country whose most professed religion is Islam and Malay as their ethnic group. Afterward, the current study findings regarding ethnic group and religion were in the same line of country's sociodemographic profile.

Cronbach's alpha the most frequently used to quantify the coefficient of reliability (or consistency).[63] It was suggested that it is so convenient because easy to compute on every occasion a multi-item scale is administered. Cronbach's alpha are extensively utilized since powerful manuscripts have recommended that it denotes adequately to assess reliability.[64] “Coefficient α usually provides a good estimate of reliability because sampling of content is usually the major source of measurement error for static constructs and should be applied to all new measurement methods.”[65] The current study found the Cronbach's alpha was 0.709–0.740. The rules of thumb of Cronbach's alpha: α ≥0.9, 0.9> α ≥0.8, 0.8> α ≥0.7, 0.7> α ≥0.6, 0.6> α ≥0.5, and 0.5> α were considered as excellent, good, acceptable, questionable, poor, and unacceptable, respectively.[66],[67],[68] Cronbach's alpha of this study was within the range of acceptable level and very similar to the original study.[41] Convergent validity is a subcategory of construct validity and often used in sociology, psychology, and other behavioral sciences. Construct validity means that a test intended to quantity a construct (i.e., intelligence) is computing that construct. Convergent validity can able to substantiate two comparable constructs resemble with one another. On the other hand, discriminant validity displays that two measures that are unique constructs and easily differentiated.[69],[70] Most of the items correlate moderately to excellent to their own domain regarding the convergent validity of the current study (P< 0.05).[71] Hereafter, the current study result designates the acceptable level of internal consistency reliability and convergent validity of the TEQ inventory. Accordingly, this questionnaire can be considered as reliable and valid for local Malaysian context.

The mean scores of the TEQ were found quite like the original overseas study and earlier another study.[41],[45] The female study respondents had significantly higher score than their counterpart. One longitudinal study concluded that “a greater empathic response in females than in males of the same age, differences growing with age.”[72] Another study reported that women and those medical students intended to pursue the carrier to community-oriented specialty they possess higher empathy.[38] Hereafter, the current study findings were in the same line of earlier study findings. Again, there was no significant difference observed in the TEQ scores type of admission and year of study. This can be explained by the following quote. “Humans are a cooperative species, capable of altruism and the creation of shared norms that ensure fairness in society. However, individuals with different educational, cultural, economic, or ethnic backgrounds differ in their levels of social investment and endorsement of egalitarian values.” As the current study population grown almost similar socioeconomic background, thereafter, UPNM medical students possess a nearly equal level of empathy. Finally, almost all the study population maintain at least average level of the TEQ score as 45 out of 64 points were considered an average level.[41] Consequently, UPNM medical students had the average level of empathy. This was cross-sectional study, therefore, only denotes a snap-shot, not video film. Moreover, the study population was the only one University of Malaysia. More research is advocated to generalize the data and future policy development and intervention program.


  Conclusion Top


The TEQ instrument was found valid and reliable for local Malaysian context. The UPNM medical students had average empathy level. Educational intervention can be adapted to enhance better understanding of empathy which in turn improves patient care for ordinary Malaysian people.

Acknowledgment

Investigators are profoundly grateful to Dr. R. Nathan Spreng, Assistant Professor, Rebecca Q. and James C. Morgan Sesquicentennial Faculty Fellow Laboratory of Brain and Cognition Department of Human Development, Martha Van Rensselaer Hall G62C, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; for his kind permission to utilize the instrument. Investigators are also immensely obliged to those medical students who in their busy schedule participated in this study. Investigators finally appreciative Centre for Research and Innovation Management, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia for the all cooperation and approval of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study obtained financial support of MYR5000/-from Centre for Research and Innovation Management, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Hrdy SB. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hanson R. How Did Humans Become Empathic? Empathy is Unusual in the Animal Kingdom; 2010. Available from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-wise-brain/201003/how-did-humans-become-empathic. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 29].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hanson R, Mendius R. Buddha's brain: The practical neuroscience of happiness, love, and wisdom. In: Two Wolves in the Heart. Ch. 8. Oakland, CA United States: New Harbinger Publications Inc.; 2009. p. 121-36.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fowler C. Why Empathy Is Your Most Important Skill (and How to Practice It); 2017; Available from: https://www.lifehacker.com/why-empathy-is-your-most -important-skill-and-how-to-pr-1505011685. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 29].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nowak A. The Power of Empathy. PINC 15; 2014; Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoEC7qMvTFE. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 29].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001;286:1897-902.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Hirsch EM. The role of empathy in medicine: A Medical student's perspective. Virtual Mentor 2007;9:423-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Gilliar W. Medical Students Need to Learn the Potent Medicine of Empathy. Available from: https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/29/medical-students-learn-empathy/. [Last accessed on 2017 Oct 29].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Chen DC, Kirshenbaum DS, Yan J, Kirshenbaum E, Aseltine RH. Characterizing changes in student empathy throughout medical school. Med Teach 2012;34:305-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Nunes P, Williams S, Bidyadhar SA, Stevenson K. A study of empathy decline in students from five health disciplines during their first year of training. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Maslach C, Jackson S. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occup Behav 1981;2:99-113.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Massie FS, Power DV, Eacker A, Harper W, et al. Burnout and suicidal ideation among U.S. Medical students. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:334-41.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Brazeau CM, Schroeder R, Rovi S, Boyd L. Relationships between medical student burnout, empathy, and professionalism climate. Acad Med 2010;85:S33-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Veloski JJ, Erdmann JB, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to academic performance, clinical competence and gender. Med Educ 2002;36:522-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K, Markham F, Wender R, Gonnella JS. Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction with physician, interpersonal trust, and compliance. Int J Med Educ 2010;1:83-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Borracci RA, Doval HC, Celano L, Ciancio A, Manente D, Calderón JG, et al. Patients' perceptions of argentine physicians' empathy based on the Jefferson scale of patient's perceptions of physician empathy: Psychometric data and demographic differences. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2017;30:19-25.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bikker AP, Mercer SW, Reilly D. A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow homoeopathic hospital. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:591-600.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Mercer SW, Jani BD, Maxwell M, Wong SY, Watt GC. Patient enablement requires physician empathy: A cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Fam Pract 2012;13:6.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    
19.
Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: A structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 2007;69:63-75.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52 Suppl:S9-12.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M, et al. Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:1563-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bayne H, Neukrug E, Hays D, Britton B. A comprehensive model for optimizing empathy in person-centered care. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:209-15.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ, Bylund CL, Carroll G, Rouse RA, Goldstein MG, et al. Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2009;75:3-10.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Parkin T, de Looy A, Farrand P. Greater professional empathy leads to higher agreement about decisions made in the consultation. Patient Educ Couns 2014;96:144-50.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]    
25.
Rakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, Hoeft T, Chewning B, Marchand L, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:390-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Henriquez KM, Hayney MS, Xie Y, Zhang Z, Barrett B. Association of interleukin-8 and neutrophils with nasal symptom severity during acute respiratory infection. J Med Virol 2015;87:330-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Venge P, Douhan-Håkansson L, Garwicz D, Peterson C, Xu S, Pauksen K, et al. Human neutrophil lipocalin as a superior diagnostic means to distinguish between acute bacterial and viral infections. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2015;22:1025-32.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS, et al. Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med 2011;86:359-64.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2013;63:e76-84.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    
30.
Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J. Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:496-503.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]    
31.
Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland – a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:240-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]    
32.
Haughney J, Cotton P, Rosen JP, Rosen JP, Morrison K, Price D, et al. The use of a modification of the patient enablement instrument in asthma. Prim Care Respir J 2007;16:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M. Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 1997;75:i-xii, 1-32.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H, et al. Quality at general practice consultations: Cross sectional survey. BMJ 1999;319:738-43.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Yu FS, Yip BH, Kung K, Fung CS, Wong CK, Lam AT, et al. The association of types of training and practice settings with doctors' empathy and patient enablement among patients with chronic illness in Hong Kong. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144492.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]    
36.
Hojat M, Zuckerman M, Magee M, Mangione S, Nasca T, Vergare M, et al. Empathy in medical students as related to specialty interest, personality, and perceptions of mother and father. Pers Individ Dif 2005;39:1205-15.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Duarte MI, Branco MC, Raposo ML, Rodrigues PJ. Empathy in medical students as related to gender, year of medical school and specialty interest. South Asian J Med Educ 2015;9:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Santos MA, Grosseman S, Morelli TC, Giuliano IC, Erdmann TR. Empathy differences by gender and specialty preference in medical students: A study in Brazil. Int J Med Educ 2016;7:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]    
39.
Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Empathy in UK medical students: Differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest. Educ Prim Care 2011;22:297-303.  Back to cited text no. 39
[PUBMED]    
40.
Emmanouil S, Maria M, Frideriki S, Apostolos T. Exploring correlation between early clinical skills teaching and self-reported competence of senior medical students; a cross-sectional study. Aristotle Univ Med J 2016;43:13-23.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Spreng RN, McKinnon MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Pers Assess 2009;91:62-71.  Back to cited text no. 41
[PUBMED]    
42.
William I. Empathic Accuracy. New York: Guilford Press; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Gayle B, Kerslake J. Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy, and loneliness. Comput Hum Behav 2015;48:255-60.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Robinson OC, Wright GR. The prevalence, types and perceived outcomes of crisis episodes in early adulthood and midlife: A structured retrospective-autobiographical study. Int J Behav Dev 2013;37:407-16.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Lelorain S, Sultan S, Zenasni F, Catu-Pinault A, Jaury P, Boujut E, et al. Empathic concern and professional characteristics associated with clinical empathy in French general practitioners. Eur J Gen Pract 2013;19:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 45
[PUBMED]    
46.
Lamothe M, Boujut E, Zenasni F, Sultan S. To be or not to be empathic: The combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:15.  Back to cited text no. 46
[PUBMED]    
47.
Cusi AM, Macqueen GM, Spreng RN, McKinnon MC. Altered empathic responding in major depressive disorder: Relation to symptom severity, illness burden, and psychosocial outcome. Psychiatry Res 2011;188:231-6.  Back to cited text no. 47
[PUBMED]    
48.
Parlar M, Frewen P, Nazarov A, Oremus C, MacQueen G, Lanius R, et al. Alterations in empathic responding among women with posttraumatic stress disorder associated with childhood Trauma. Brain Behav 2014;4:381-9.  Back to cited text no. 48
[PUBMED]    
49.
Baldner C, Mcginley JJ. Correlational and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) of commonly used empathy questionnaires: New insights. Motiv Emot 2014;38:727-44.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Celik K, Saritas E, Catalbas G. The effect of student teachers' liking of children and empathic tendency on the attitudes of teaching profession. Int J Soc Sci Educ 2013;3:499-510.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Totan T, Dogan T, Sapmaz F. The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Eurasian J Educ Res 2012;46:179-98.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Miu AC, Balteş FR. Empathy manipulation impacts music-induced emotions: A psychophysiological study on opera. PLoS One 2012;7:e30618.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Balteş FR, Miu AC. Emotions during live music performance: links with individual differences in empathy, visual imagery, and mood. Psychomusicol Music Mind Brain 2014;24:58-65.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Youssef FF, Nunes P, Sa B, Williams S. An exploration of changes in cognitive and emotional empathy among medical students in the Caribbean. Int J Med Educ 2014;5:185-92.  Back to cited text no. 54
[PUBMED]    
55.
Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ 2008;72:43.  Back to cited text no. 55
[PUBMED]    
56.
Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assess Eval High Educ 2008;33:301-14.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Jessup JE, Coakley RW. Guide to the Study and Use of Military History. Washington DC: Centre for Military History, United States Army; 1998. Available from: http://www.indianstrategicknowledgeonline.com/web/jessup_intro.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 17].  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Carvel J. Concern as Women Outnumber Men in Medical Schools. UK News. The Guardian; 2002. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jul/04/medicalscience.nhs. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 17].  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Weale S. UK's University Gender Gap is a National Scandal, Says Thinktank. Higher Education. The Guardian; 2016. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/may/12/university-gender-gap-scandal-thinktank-men. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 17].  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Zulkifli A, Rogayah J. Career preferences of male and female medical students in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 1997;52:76-81.  Back to cited text no. 60
[PUBMED]    
61.
Ismail S, Salam A, Alattraqchi AG, Annamalai L, Chockalingam A, Elena WP, et al. Evaluation of doctors' performance as facilitators in basic medical science lecture classes in a new Malaysian medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015;6:231-7.  Back to cited text no. 61
[PUBMED]    
62.
Haque M, Rahman NI, Zulkifli Z, Ismail S. Antibiotic prescribing and resistance: Knowledge level of medical students of clinical years of university Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016;12:413-26.  Back to cited text no. 62
[PUBMED]    
63.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
John OP, Soto CJ. The importance of being valid: Reliability and the process of construct validation. In: Robins RW, Fraley RC, Krueger RF, editors. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology. New York: Guilford; 2007. p. 461-94.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Gregersen H, Lybæk M, Lauge Johannesen I, Leicht P, Nissen UV, Biering-Sørensen F, et al. Satisfaction with upper extremity surgery in individuals with tetraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38:161-9.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Kaleem, Raza S, Moiz JA, Iqbal M, Verma S. Reliability and validity of EN-TreeM dynamometer for measurement of shoulder rotator strength in volleyball players. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:YC05-9.  Back to cited text no. 67
[PUBMED]    
68.
Das KD, Patra S, Koley M, Saha S. Bengali questionnaire validation among geriatric population visiting homeopathic hospital and subsequent open observational trial evaluating effectiveness of homeopathic treatment. Adv Integr Med 2017;4:66-73.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959;56:81-105.  Back to cited text no. 69
[PUBMED]    
70.
Napper LE, Wood MM, Jaffe A, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL, Klahn JA, et al. Convergent and discriminant validity of three measures of stage of change. Psychol Addict Behav 2008;22:362-71.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.  Back to cited text no. 71
[PUBMED]    
72.
Mestre MV, Samper P, Frías MD, Tur AM. Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. Span J Psychol 2009;12:76-83.  Back to cited text no. 72
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed380    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded82    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal